to be fair to the post-leftist stuff, i don't think john is in any way representative of it.
to be fair to post-leftist anarchism, I don't think I am either!
(in part because a lot of it is about rejecting the idea of a 'movement' which people are either part of or not - in which case it's not possible for me to be representative of anything other than my own position).
the best stuff I've found is the articles on the Institute for Anarchist Studies site:
http://www.anarchist-studies.org/publications/theory_politics
yes, we need to find some cooperative route which we can all agree to
no - we need to avoid imposing hierarchy on others too
not if dissent is tolerated in the future
I don't understand this part of your argument - do you mean that most 'non-politicals' (whoever they are, and I seriously doubt if they exist) are acting in a desirous way, and that all we need is for all the 'politicals' to act like 'non-politicals'?
maybe!
sorry, I don't understand what you mean - 'frosty'?