I understand there is a general idea that for communication, propaganda and organization. choice of language doesn't matter much apart from some notion of being accesible.
That said, I feel confused as to why libertarian communists continue to use the word "political" for anything except statecraft or attempts to get into a position to influence statecraft.
For most working people I know, the word politics is always negative. I think they are basically right. I don't think this need be apathetic or anti-intelektual. I think this attitude is against pro activism, against others speaking for us, alienation, and the left.
What work does "poilitics/political" do other words dont? I am sure someone will flame this as nitpicking, or over-estimating the importance of terminilogy, maybe even ironic. I think it is part of breaking with the left.
Yes words can be used in different senses, but I think this is beyond that.
A lot of marxists like to use it in a way I'm completely unware what they mean. See: Goldner's New Piece on SPAIN
I think in part by "political power" or "political" he means consciousness or uniformity of mindfulness? It's all hegelian anyway.