Who else does the IWW organise?

Now that it has come out the the IWW 'organises' Scottish members of Parliment, and there is also a preacher from America, posting on here, who is an IWW member, I'd like to know if they 'organise' any other shockingly anti-working class 'fellow workers'.

It puts all of the anarcho-syndicalist arguments that we had here a while ago about whether they should organise workers in prisons (not prison officers) to shame.

Devrim

Posted By

Devrim
Dec 19 2006 08:19

Share

Attached files

Comments

throwhen
Feb 14 2007 16:38
revol68 wrote:
throwhen wrote:
revol68 wrote:
throwhen wrote:
revol68 wrote:
throwhen wrote:
John. wrote:
x357997 wrote:
fuck, he reminds me of all the stupid rich kids that I used to go to school with....

x357997 - you've been warned before, you seem incapable of refraining from personal insults, but you should.

Chuck and Duke - why is it you feel you must consistently post stupid bullshit everywhere? Cut it out.

we try posting thoughtful shit,and then weirdy british fuckers call us non-sensical insults and crazy ass london slang.

so....dodge that rumble trumpskin

oi i'm only british on tuesdays, thursdays and saturdays!

see..that's the kind of british humor I don't get. What the fuck does that mean and why is it supposed to be funny?

i live in belfast, go to wikipedia and tell them i told you to get a clue.

if britian owns you...then your fucking british. I can't help it that you fuckers couldn't free yourself.

nah there's a time share agreement, i can pick to be irish or british by law, i'm just confused by it.

either learn gallic or accept your status as a limey bastard.

throwhen
Feb 14 2007 16:43
revol68 wrote:
Quote:
either learn gallic or accept your status as a limey bastard.

learn gallic? what's that?

You do realise limey is just for the English not the scots or welsh.

does britian own scotland, wales, and a bunch of other useless islands around the North Sea...?

if so...all british, limey, fucks with a strange sense of humor?

the button
Feb 14 2007 16:46
revol68 wrote:
if only our humour was as sophisticated as our north american cousins.

It's true. They are, after all, the great nation that gave us Friends. Or Cunts, as I prefer to call it.

Anyway, revol, you wouldn't have any Irish nationalism to bitch about other posters being soft on, if our transatlantic cousins hadn't so kindly bankrolled it all those years. So just think on.

throwhen
Feb 14 2007 16:49
the button wrote:
revol68 wrote:
if only our humour was as sophisticated as our north american cousins.

It's true. They are, after all, the great nation that gave us Friends. Or Cunts, as I prefer to call it.

Anyway, revol, you wouldn't have any Irish nationalism to bitch about other posters being soft on, if our transatlantic cousins hadn't so kindly bankrolled it all those years. So just think on.

yeah no shit. thank our mobs, our bars, and our unions for funding your IRA.

I'll take thank you....the irish bartenders that ran my union for the last hundred years i'm sure helped free part of your people from the yolk of limey oppression and bad denistry.

thugarchist
Feb 14 2007 17:20

I find Chuck's anti-Irish sentiment offensive.

thugarchist
Feb 14 2007 17:30
revol68 wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
I find Chuck's anti-Irish sentiment offensive.

I won't tommorrow.

My family were big Sinn Fein supporters when I was growing up. Boston Irish Jews. We supported Isreal and the IRA. Heh.

Smash Rich Bastards
Feb 14 2007 18:11
EdmontonWobbly wrote:
To be fair I think rise was caught out on a few pretty rediculous exagerations, and considering he was accusing an anarchist group of collaborating with counter revolutionary tendencies I really don't think it should be treated as any different than say snitch jacketing. Just my opinion anyways.

Okay, and although I consider Rise a friend and comrade, I would agree with you and everyone else here. Not sure that gives a green light for one of the moderators to call him a twat... especially if he is going to hold a double standard for other posters. The anarchist world already has one Chuck0 to fill the hypocritical admin role. Do we really need any more?

Smash Rich Bastards
Feb 14 2007 18:17
the button wrote:
revol68 wrote:
if only our humour was as sophisticated as our north american cousins.

It's true. They are, after all, the great nation that gave us Friends. Or Cunts, as I prefer to call it.

What about Family Guy and South Park? Or Chapelle's Show? Give us some credit, we've come a long way.

thugarchist
Feb 15 2007 00:16
Smash Rich Bastards wrote:
EdmontonWobbly wrote:
To be fair I think rise was caught out on a few pretty rediculous exagerations, and considering he was accusing an anarchist group of collaborating with counter revolutionary tendencies I really don't think it should be treated as any different than say snitch jacketing. Just my opinion anyways.

Okay, and although I consider Rise a friend and comrade, I would agree with you and everyone else here. Not sure that gives a green light for one of the moderators to call him a twat... especially if he is going to hold a double standard for other posters. The anarchist world already has one Chuck0 to fill the hypocritical admin role. Do we really need any more?

I was sure you were gonna say ChuckO filled the twat role.

thugarchist
Feb 15 2007 00:29
revol68 wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
revol68 wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
I find Chuck's anti-Irish sentiment offensive.

I won't tommorrow.

My family were big Sinn Fein supporters when I was growing up. Boston Irish Jews. We supported Isreal and the IRA. Heh.

makes perfect sense, both are a bunch of whinging little bitches playing on a victimhood identity to stake claims on territory that the current inhabitants aren't willing to hand over. wink

My people killed jesus. Give us some credit.