Perhaps this would be a subject open for discussion as well.
I figured that the matter of the USI would be a "make or break" one for the IWA. What I'm curious about is what was the view or position taken by comrades in regards to the USI's on-going participation in the RSU? And how does their participation in the RSU differ much from CNT-Vignoles participation in work place committees or for that matter from the Spanish CGT's?
This question is not meant in a hostile way. I'm merely trying to get a sense of how this contradictory situation was discussed and resolved. While I may not share the USI's point of view, I wouldn't want to see them (or the FAU for that matter) booted from the IWA.
Firstly the USI argue that the RSUs are different than the workplace committees that the Vignoles and the CGT-E participate in. They also say their partial participation, in them (not all of USI participate) is tactical and that they are actively seeking an alternative to them. They still organise workplace meetings unlike the others.