This article discusses Dauve's text and colonialist attitudes of radicals in general. It mentions: the example of green anarchy vs. EZLN debate. Replies to Dauve point by point. and concludes by saying that some revolutionaries and organizations in the west, due to their sectarian impotence fail to see the revolutionary creativity and potential of Rojava. It is a nice read, enjoy:
http://roarmag.org/2015/04/zapatistas-rojava-anarchist-revolution/
Right, that's us told and we should hang our heads in fucking shame.
But to be honest, it all feels a bit back to the early 80s for me, this. Back then, a refugee mate from Iran was always telling me how I should support the Mujahadin Khalk and a Leninist mate never stopped telling me to back the Sandinistas and the FMLN. Both accused me and every other anarchist they met of siding with colonialism, both were talking bollocks, as is that bellend, Petar Stanchev.
Anyway, I'll have to just live with the accusation. Can't wait for episode 2 though, in which we're all called racist for not showing sufficient enthusiasm for the Nation of Islam.